Progressive Policy Institute



The Institute

New from PPI

Memos to the New President

2008 Briefing Series

Events

Press Center

Issues
National Defense & Homeland Security

Foreign Policy

Economic & Fiscal Policy

Trade & Global Markets

Energy & Environment

Clean Tech Climate Change Energy Civic Solutions Natural Resources Trade Emerging Issues Second Generation Policy About This Project Health Care

Technology & Innovation

The New Economy

Work, Family & Community

National Service & Civic Enterprise

Quality of Life

Crime & Public Safety

Political Reform

Education


The Third Way



All_Our_Might.com

About PPIContact UsPress Centerspacer

Energy & Environment
Natural Resources

PPI | Backgrounder | September 8, 2005
Green Gospel
The Rise of Religious Environmentalism
By Jan Mazurek


Editor's Note: The full text of this policy report is available in Adobe PDF format, only. (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.)

Introduction

Liberal environmentalists have long been at odds with the Bush administration on issues ranging from greenhouse gas emissions to mercury pollution. But now, in addition to those voices on the left side of the political spectrum, the president is also hearing murmurs of discontent on his right flank. The grumbles are coming from a new religious environmental movement that has begun to frame issues such as global warming as matters of scriptural conscience. Its ranks include evangelical Protestants -- key Bush voters -- along with many Catholics and Jews. The green gospel they are preaching may hold the potential to reshape political coalitions on certain issues and break longstanding logjams that have kept important environmental legislation from moving forward on Capitol Hill. Indeed, just as a rift opened up in the Democratic Party in the 1990s over trade issues, there are early signs that such a rift may now be opening in the Republican Party coalition between religious environmentalists and hard-line free marketeers who reflexively view environmental laws as threats to economic growth.

"The environment is a values issue," the Rev. Ted Haggard, president of the 30 million-member National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), told The Washington Post in February. "There are significant and compelling theological reasons why it should be a banner issue for the Christian right." Last fall, the NAE issued a broad Evangelical Call to Civic Responsibility that included the Biblical argument for environmental protection. Citing Genesis 2:15, it said, "We affirm that God-given dominion is a sacred responsibility to steward the earth and not a license to abuse the creation of which we are a part." As a broad public policy matter, the NAE continued, "This implies the principle of sustainability: our uses of the earth must be designed to conserve and renew the earth rather than to deplete or destroy it." And it offered a specific agenda: "We urge government to encourage fuel efficiency, reduce pollution, encourage sustainable use of natural resources, and provide for the proper care of wildlife and their natural habitats."

The issue of global warming has been a particularly fraught topic. President Bush has called on industry to voluntarily reduce emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the most prevalent gas implicated in global climate change. But an alliance of religious groups pressed the U.S. Senate last year to go further and pass legislation that would formally regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Richard Cizik, NAE's chief lobbyist and a self-described "Bush Republican," told The Wall Street Journal at the time, "I disagree with the president on this one." Christianity Today, an influential evangelical magazine, also weighed in on the subject, writing: "Christians should make it clear to governments and businesses that we are willing to adapt our lifestyles and support steps towards changes that protect our environment." To underscore their commitment to doing something about climate change, Christianity Today editors endorsed a bill, sponsored by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.), that would impose the first-ever legal limits on greenhouse gases. The Bush administration has thus far opposed the bill, arguing that enforceable greenhouse gas limits would cost too much.


Download the full text of this report. (PDF)


Jan Mazurek is director of PPI's Energy and Environment Project.



Search Tips 

Support PPI
Make an online gift
Get Email Updates
Learn More  

Print Printable Version of this Article

Send this Article to a FriendSend this Article to a Friend

File Attachments Full_Report.pdf

Privacy Statementndol_ci.cfm?contentid=250168&kaid=106&subid=122Email GroupsJobsInternshipsSupportOur Publications

Site designed and managed by Beaconfire Consulting