Progressive Policy Institute



The Institute

New from PPI

Memos to the New President

2008 Briefing Series

Events

Press Center

Issues
National Defense & Homeland Security

Foreign Policy

Economic & Fiscal Policy

Trade & Global Markets

Energy & Environment

Clean Tech Climate Change Energy Civic Solutions Natural Resources Trade Emerging Issues Second Generation Policy About This Project Health Care

Technology & Innovation

The New Economy

Work, Family & Community

National Service & Civic Enterprise

Quality of Life

Crime & Public Safety

Political Reform

Education


The Third Way



All_Our_Might.com

About PPIContact UsPress Centerspacer

Energy & Environment
Climate Change

PPI | Backgrounder | March 1, 2000
How a Domestic Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Market Could Work in Practice
A Supplement to the November 1999 Policy Report "Reframing the Climate Change Debate"
By Debra S. Knopman and Jonathan Naimon


Editor's Note: The full text of this report is available in Adobe PDF format, only. (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.)

Introduction

This backgrounder provides a preliminary description of policy options for organizing and dividing responsibilities among private and public participants in a domestic greenhouse gas emissions trading market. It supplements the proposal outlined in the November 1999 Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) policy report "Reframing the Climate Change Debate: The United States Should Build a Domestic Market Now for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions." The PPI proposal takes advantage of key features of the on-going, successful, market-based sulfur dioxide trading program and Toxics Release Inventory.

Markets thrive on widely available, credible information about prices, supply, and demand. Similarly, a domestic greenhouse gas emissions trading market will depend on the powerful engine of information about actual emissions and climate- friendly behavior throughout the economy. The proposed market would use direct reporting of emissions reductions instead of a government-based certification process. This would be similar to procedures now employed successfully by the Securities and Exchange Commission to regulate financial reporting, and the Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory for reporting chemical releases to the environment. Market participants would be responsible for the veracity of information they submit to the government and an independently operated greenhouse gas emissions market exchange -- and be subject to penalties if the information is found incorrect through government-led spot audits or citizen-initiated legal actions.


Download this report (PDF)....


Debra Knopman is the Director of the Progressive Policy Institute's Center for Innovation & the Environment. Jonathan Naimon is a co-founder of Light Green Advisors, a Seattle-based investment advisory firm specializing in constructing portfolios of environmental leadership companies.



Search Tips 

Support PPI
Make an online gift
Get Email Updates
Learn More  

Print Printable Version of this Article

Send this Article to a FriendSend this Article to a Friend

File Attachments Full_Report.pdf


Related Links PPI Roundtable Discussion on Trading Markets for Greenhouse Gas Credits

Privacy Statementndol_ci.cfm?contentid=250168&kaid=106&subid=122Email GroupsJobsInternshipsSupportOur Publications

Site designed and managed by Beaconfire Consulting